November 12, 2014 Criminal complaints against Sergeant Michael Esposito, #123 MGL-263-2 False arrest (3 counts) https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartIV/TitleI/Chapter263/Section2 MGL-265-37 Violation of constitutional rights https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartIV/TitleI/Chapter265/Section37 MGL-269-13a Falsification of police report (5 counts) https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartIV/TitleI/Chapter269/Section13A MGL-272-99 Wiretap https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartIV/TitleI/Chapter272/Section99 MGL-268 https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartIV/TitleI/Chapter268 MGL-268A https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartIV/TitleI/Chapter268A MGL-269 https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartIV/TitleI/Chapter269 Count 1: MGL-263-2 False arrest My false arrest on the grounds of trespassing on private property when I was in fact on public property (Burr Street). Count 2: MGL-263-2 False arrest One false charge of secretly recording the police (wiretapping). One false charge of possession of a wiretapping device (a small recorder). Every single cell phone is a secret recording device. Which kind of explains why the court house no longer allows cell phones. Count 3: MGL-263-2 False arrest A false charge of being a disorderly person without specification of what action I took that properly describes me as being disorderly. Sergeant Micheal Esposito (#123) falsified most of the police report to create an environment of danger to be used as a probable cause to arrest me on the charge of trespassing given that otherwise there was no other probable cause. Count 1: MGL-269-13a Falsification of police report He starts the report by stating a truck one quarter mile away allegedly crush 4 of the "protective plastic traffic barriers" (plastic orange barrels) No truck license plate or description of this imaginary truck. Count 2: MGL-269-13a Falsification of police report Falsification of the police report in stating that there was no protection for a pedestrian when there was both a curb and a guard rail. I was safer at this point than most places within the shopping center. I do not feel safe when I'm walking to my car thru the parking lot at Shoppers World. He states that he had to get me over the guard rail to the road. One can see a well worn path where I was standing. How come there haven't been any arrests until I showed up there. Count 3: MGL-269-13a Falsification of police report Falsification of the police report stating I was dangerously close to a truck. The term "dangerously close is highly subjective. Can you specify that in feet or yards. I did not see a truck within 100 feet of me at the time of the arrest. Stating that I was a distraction, but the cars going thru Burr street in both directions were not a distraction. Sounds bogus. I was three feet behind a guard rail. If the truck he describes was backing in at gate #2, the officer could not have conceivably parked his cruiser where he did. It would be a physical imposibility. Five feet behind me was a steep dropoff into a small lake (which was why the guard rail was there). I did not sense any apprehension or feel any sense of danger and if I had, I would certainly not be taking pictures with a camera near my eyes. After all, I am 65 years old and you don't get there by being careless. I did however sense apprehension when I saw a police cruiser with its lights on come speeding in on my left and block one of the lanes in the roadway. The officer came out and immediately (with great haste) approached me. If there was a truck backing in as he claimed, then he could not have parked his cruiser where he did without the truck crushing it. Sergeant Michael Esposito better provide some very hard evidence to back up his fabricated statements. Count 4: MGL-269-13a Falsification of police report Falsification of the police report stating that I was a danger to the construction workers. How exactly was I a danger to the construction workers? The construction workers were over 150 feet away. And the cars passing by were not a danger to the construction workers? Sergeant Michael Esposito better provide some very hard evidence to back up his fabricated statements. Count 5: MGL-269-13a Falsification of police report Falsification of the police report stating that a large oversized truck and trailer combination was attempting to to make his move and back into the work site. There was no such truck, and apparently, if there was such a truck, this truck was not a distraction or a danger to the construction workers. Less than a week before this Anthony Gines told me not to take pictures of the construction and I told him to go to hell. When do Massport personnel tell me to do something while I'm at a shopping center? Is there yet another secret law? Anthony Gines was the shop stewart for Consigli Construction, a contractor working on behalf of Massport is complaining about someone standing on Shopper's World property and complains to the Framingham police. What authority does he have to complain about me on someone else's property. I believe it should be someone from Shoppers World complaining about me trespassing. Did any owner of Shopper's World complain about me trespassing? No. Sergeant Michael Esposito was targeting me for calling his wife Sergeant Kathryn Esposito an escapee from the Center For The Visually Unpleasant on a web page. Immediately upon my arrest, Michael Esposito stated "OK, we got him!" indicating that there was a plan in motion. Who was he talking to? It seemed to be a very very odd remark to make. If he claims that I recorded him, this remark should be in the .WAV file. All of his chatter on police radio at that time should be reviewed. I suspect he was talking to his wife, Kathy Esposito. While handcuffed and standing next to him, I took note of Michael Esposito looking at Sergeant Scott Brown taking pictures or video of me and said nothing on his police report of this egregarious behaviour by a fellow police officer. I guess Michael Esposito approved of Scott Brown's behaviour. I would like to have all voice transmissions by both Esposito's between 10:00 and 11:00 on October 29, 2014 After the arrest, Michael Esposito pulled me into the street where I could have easily been run over by trucks and cars and did not feel safe. Michael Esposito refers to the Shoppers World sign specifiying MGL 266 Sec 120D but I fail to see what that has to do with my case. According to him, anyone not specifically shopping is trespassing. This implies that pedestrians, byciclists and commutters passing thru Shoppers World are all trespassing. I love the capitalization of "ANY OTHER USE". Trespassing https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartIV/TitleI/Chapter266/Section120 https://malegislature.gov/laws/generallaws/partiv/titlei/chapter266/section120d Disorderly conduct https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartIV/TitleI/Chapter272/Section53 Wiretap https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartIV/TitleI/Chapter272/Section99 Harold J. Wolfe 65 Delmar Ave Framingham, MA 01701 508-877-5541 hjwolfe@gmail.com

Send comments to: hjw2001@gmail.com